/regulation & compliance

News and resources on regulation, compliance, legal and governance issues for banks and fintechs.

Discussion
AI: Do Regulators Have a Hope of Keeping Pace?
Ketharaman Swaminathan

Ketharaman Swaminathan

  No. Regulators cannot keep up with AI.  Take ChatGPT itself as an example. It's the pinnacle of leveraging of Regulatory Gap, which has been the strategy followed by fintech, rideshare, room share and many startup industries in regulated industries.  While training ChatGPT, OpenAI scraped data from billions of websites without their express permission and probably in violation of their TOS. Now that ChatGPT is launched and popular, OpenAI has announced steps that website owners can take to prevent their websites from getting scraped by OpenAI's bot. This is unethical, if not also illegal in some jurisdictions. But will any regulator shut ChatGPT down now? Had OpenAI announced, in advance, its plans to slurp the content of billions of websites when it started doing so a few years ago, I can bet that ChatGPT would have been DOA.
Morgan Stanley hit with £5.4 million fine after energy traders used WhatsApp
A Finextra Member

A Finextra member

  At an unnamed US operation of a foriegn IB, I was going through all billing (I'd been there maybe a year) from Bloomberg, and suddenly realized that I wasn't seeing anything from B Vault.  I checked with another vendor, and learned that the latter made messaging available for downloading and review, but we didn't seem to be doing anything with it.  From BB, we had something setup, but it was all a mystery.  Got into it, and discovered that a few years earlier, it was being setup.  But what I found made it clear that it hadn't been touched since then.  Many current users were not set up, most had no managers set up to review their messaging (the managers actually cared, for the most part, though some didn't, and some didn't want anyone in their 'business')..  Turns out that my then new boss had been in charge of the setup, then apparently walked away from it.  I told him it was a problem, but it was like he was Sgt Schultz in Hogans Heroes - I see nothing, I hear Nothing, I know nothing.  IOTW, don't bother me.  Until his former coworkers in internal audit informed me that they wanted to see where things stood.  Then my boss suddenly got religion.  He was a tiny bit helpful in getting a few bosses to cooperate, not in actually doing things.  A coworker and I basically set it up like new, learned how to administer it, And by the time I had to leave because my job was moving out of my commuting range (I WAS HYBRID, there was no good reason for it) we were mostly up again on BV.  But of course, no one wanted to know about other such exposures.   One sort of related thought; in my first full time Managing Market Data job, the trading floors had lockers for all phones.  But no one used them.  Surprise, surprise.  Compliance in a major bank?  Frequenty a huge, bad joke.
Seigniorage : The last roll of the dice for cash
David Hensley
Blog group founder

David Hensley

  Thanks Paul. I'm as interested in accessing the written down cash as the income it generates
Seigniorage : The last roll of the dice for cash
K Paul Blond

K Paul Blond

  Interesting article David Central Banks often pay over seigniorage income to Government separately to budgeting for cash issuing and handling costs, so not netted out. If it was net figure and a sum be directly apportioned for cash access and assurance purposes a lot of the current issues could be resolved. As interest rates rise seigniorage income becomes a bigger ticket item (although typically offsetting the underlying government assets at also higher rates) - a bit like a mortgage offset account!
Pilar Arzuaga

Generative AI: Why data protection needs to be emphasised

Pilar Arzuaga - Senior Associate, McDermott, Will & Emery